Bell & Gossett E-60 VS E-90 Pumps
Here’s a comparative blog-style deep dive into the Bell & Gossett e-60 vs e-90 series pumps. If you work with hydronic / HVAC pump selection, replacement, or maintenance, understanding how these two lines differ can help ensure you pick the best pump for your system.
Introduction
Bell & Gossett (a Xylem brand) manufactures several in-line centrifugal pumps for HVAC, potable water, and other clean fluid applications. Two of their newer lines are the e-60 and e-90 series. While they share many features and are both intended for high reliability and efficiency, each has design trade-offs and application sweet spots. Below I compare how they stack up in various dimensions:
Overview of Each Series
e-60
- Designed as a small flex-coupled in-line centrifugal pump. (Xylem)
- Used for heating, cooling, potable water, and other clean-water fluid transfer applications. (Xylem)
- Range: ~0.25 HP up to ~3 HP, motor at 1,750 RPM with various sizes / configs. (National Pump Supply)
- Available in multiple material configurations: bronze-fitted, all bronze, etc. (National Pump Supply)
e-90
- Close-coupled, in-line centrifugal pump line. (Close-coupled meaning the pump and motor are integrated, without a separate coupling and bearing frame). (Xylem)
- Targeted for small commercial HVAC and similar applications. (Xylem)
- Better for applications needing compact installs, simpler maintenance in tight spaces, or where the motor-pump assembly benefit outweighs the flexibility of a flex-coupled design. (National Pump Supply)
Key Differences
Here are the major points of distinction:
Feature | e-60 | e-90 |
---|---|---|
Pump-Motor Coupling / Design | Flex-coupled (three-piece) design: separate pump, coupling, motor; allows servicing without removing piping in many cases. (Xylem) | Close-coupled design: motor and pump are integrated; no separate bearing frame. More compact; less mechanical complexity in couplings. (Xylem) |
Ease of Maintenance / Serviceability | e-60: three-piece design + “internally self-flushing, unitized mechanical seal” makes seal replacement and impeller/motor work more straightforward. Bearings are permanently lubricated. (National Pump Supply) | e-90: designed to be easy to maintain via back-pull-out (in many cases), has option for ECM (electronically commutated) motors which have quieter operation, less vibration, possibly longer life. Also uses unitized mechanical seals. (Xylem) |
Efficiency & Motor Options | Good hydraulic efficiency; range of motor sizes, but generally standard induction motors. (National Pump Supply) | Offers higher-efficiency options, especially with ECM motor variants. Quieter, lower vibration. (Xylem) |
Space / Footprint & Mounting Flexibility | Because of flex-coupled design, possibly larger footprint; more components. Requires space for the coupling and for accessing mechanical parts. | More compact due to close coupled design. Can be mounted horizontally or vertically. Better suited where space is constrained. (Xylem) |
Pressure, Temp, Performance Range | e-60 covers many clean-water, heating/cooling tasks; size range up to 3 HP; adequate for many residential/commercial systems. (AF Supply) | The e-90 line supports higher pressures (some models up to ~175 psi) and a broader temp range. Good for more demanding small-commercial applications. (National Pump Supply) |
Cost & Complexity | Possibly simpler and lower cost to manufacture; more parts but more standard components. More work to install / align / service due to coupling. | Potentially higher cost per pump (especially ECM motor versions), but savings in reduced maintenance, smaller space, and less complexity in alignment. |
Pros & Cons: When Each Is Best
When you might pick e-60
- If you need high flexibility in servicing: being able to pull the pump apart, replace seal/impeller without disturbing piping.
- If the system is larger or less constrained by space, so flex-coupled layout is acceptable or even preferable for long life.
- Where cost of initial equipment matters – maybe standard induction motors suffice.
- When you have existing systems that already use (or are designed for) e-60 / legacy Series 60 dimensions: the e-60 is dimensionally interchangeable with the older Series 60. (AF Supply)
When e-90 is the better choice
- When space is tight and you want a compact install.
- For commercial HVAC systems needing higher pressures or temperature ranges.
- If noise, vibration, and efficiency are important; especially with ECM motor options.
- Where minimal alignment or coupling maintenance overhead is desired.
- In new installations where the benefits of a close-coupled design can be fully realized (less complexity, fewer parts).
Practical Considerations & Trade-Offs
- Repair vs Replace: e-60 might be easier/cheaper to repair in the field because parts (coupling, impeller, seal) are more accessible and modular. e-90 may have fewer moving external components, but if something in the integrated motor-pump fails, the replacement part may be more specialized.
- Operating Efficiency over Time: ECM motors (available in e-90) often reduce energy consumption, especially in partial-load operation. If the pump runs often and under varying loads, this difference can add up significantly.
- Installation Costs and Labor: For e-60, alignment of coupling, ensuring correct coupling shaft length, that kind of work is needed. e-90 may reduce some of those labor costs due to the close coupling.
- Spare Parts Availability: Because e-60 has been designed to match older Series 60 dimensions, parts may be more widely available or familiar to technicians. e-90 being newer and with more variants (e.g. bronze, all bronze, ECM) may require sourcing specific parts.
Conclusion
In sum:
- Both the e-60 and e-90 are high-quality lines from Bell & Gossett.
- If your project values modularity, ease of service, and aligns with existing legacy gear, e-60 may be the more “safe” choice.
- If you’re designing a new system where space, efficiency, and maintenance economy over time are priorities, e-90 likely offers better long-term ROI.
Here are some side-by-side spec-sheet numbers and dimension data for common sizes of the Bell & Gossett e-60 vs e-90 pumps, where available; followed by highlights of what the specs imply. (Specs from the manufacturers’ submitted data, but always double-check the exact model you’re using.)
Spec Sheet Snapshots
Model / Size | Suction & Discharge Size | Motor HP | Max RPM / Motor Type | Flow & Head Range* | Max Working Pressure | Temp Range | Approx Dimension Notes / Footprint |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
e-60 — 1.25×1.25×5.25 | 1.25″ NPT | ~½ HP | 1725 RPM induction motor, also ECM versions | From data in ECM version: ~60 GPM (depending on impeller) / ~25 ft head for small models (e650-series etc.) (Pump Products) | 175 psi (12 bar) (Xylem) | −20 °F to +250 °F (varies with seal materials) (Xylem) | The 1.25×1.25×5.25 model: overall pump body plus motor bracket length (“A”, “B”, etc.) ~ around 7-8 inches motor bracket height max, overall lengths ~ around 16.5-18 in depending on HP/motor. (Xylem) |
e-60 — 1.5×1.5×7 (flex coupled) | 1.5″ NPT | ~¾-1 HP | 1750 RPM motors (standard induction) (Xylem) | Flow/head per the “1.5×1.5×7” spec sheet: flow rates up to somewhere in the neighborhood of what the curve shows for that size (depends impeller trimming). Example head up to ~60-70 ft in some trims for that size. (Xylem) | 175 psi (Xylem) | Same temp range (seal material dependent) (Xylem) | Larger size, heavier; dimension “L” (length between suction & discharge flange faces), etc. ~23.6 in for full assembly in some versions. (Xylem) |
e-90 — standard close-coupled, 1″ through 3″ | 1″ to 3″ connections (flange or companion flanges) (Xylem) | ¼-5 HP depending on size / model; ECM versions for smaller HP’s (½-1 HP) in single phase. (Xylem) | 1725 RPM for standard motors; ECM/variable speed for ECM options, some motors allow variable speed down to ~350 RPM on applicable models. (Xylem) | Hydraulic coverage: 20 GPM to 250 GPM (≈4.5 m³/hr to 56.8 m³/hr). Head can reach up to what is needed depending on model — in many cases heads up toward ~200+ ft depending on HP and impeller. (Xylem) | Also up to 175 psi (12 bar) working pressure. (Xylem) | Temp range: −10 °F to +250 °F (≈ −23 to +121 °C) for many models. (Xylem) | Because close-coupled, usually more compact in overall length vs similarly rated flex-coupled pumps; back-pull-out design helps with maintenance. Example for 1.5″/1 HP close-coupled: length “A” ~7.5-7.5 in bracket height, “B” (length) ~16-18 in or so depending on phase. (Xylem) |
* “Flow & Head Range” depends heavily on impeller size, speed, and trim. These are approximate for standard configurations.
Comparison Insights from the Numbers
From those spec snapshots, some conclusions / useful comparisons:
- Pressure Rating: Both e-60 and e-90 are built for ~175 psi (12 bar) max working pressure. So in that regard, they are similar, and either could be suitable for relatively high pressure/hydronic systems. (Xylem)
- Temperature Capability: Again similar in the higher-end for many models (~250 °F) depending on seal materials. The e-60 sometimes shows a slightly broader lower end or different options depending on seal choice. (Xylem)
- Flow / Head Coverage: The e-90 has greater maximum flow (up to ~250 GPM) than most standard e-60 models. If you need higher flow and modest to high head, the e-90 gives more range. The e-60 tends to cover smaller flows / heads (though depending on size you can push it). (Xylem)
- Dimensional / Footprint Differences: For same connection sizes, e-90 tends to have more compact length in many cases since the motor is close-coupled. For flex-coupled e-60 you have coupling components which add length and complexity. Also weight will be higher in equivalent HP, or at least bulkier in e-60 flex designs.
- Motor / Speed Variation: Both have options with variable speed / ECM in smaller sizes. But for e-90, ECM / “smart motor” versions seem more common in ½-1 HP sizes, with greater flow coverage. e-60 offers ECM for many of its smaller sizes too. The ability to go down in speed gives you more efficiency and flexibility under partial load. (Xylem)